As the 2011 season heads into Texas Motor Speedway for the running of the Samsung Mobile 500 tonight it is interesting to note how, competition-wise, the preceding six races have provided excellent storylines.
This is NASCAR’s opinion, you understand, not mine – but I must say that I agree with it.
“Storylines” might be the wrong word here. Let’s just say that what has transpired so far are simply facts that deserve our attention.
Why, you might ask. It’s because some of what we might have expected so far this season has not happened – and some of what we did not, in many ways, has.
I use as evidence of all this information provided by NASCAR; information that puts its competition in a good light. But when it comes to competition, the sanctioning body is all about promoting the quality therein whenever possible – which is its job, after all.
The facts and figures are accurate. They are not manipulated. They are what they are, and, to be honest, they are intriguing.
We’re told that two of last year’s top winners, Denny Hamlin and Jimmie Johnson, remain winless going into Texas. I’m not sure about you, but I’m one of those who thought either one of them would have been victorious by now. Heck, if nothing else, they were the hands-down favorites at Martinsville.
And you knew that, didn’t you?
Interestingly, lead-change records have fallen in three of the six Sprint Cup races so far, at Daytona, Phoenix and Martinsville.
There has been, NASCAR tells us, an average of 31.5 lead changes per race, the most after six events in series history.
Now I would be one of the first to say this is nothing but the result of racing circumstances. But I would quickly add that races that have produced record lead changes at such a high average are, if not great, certainly compelling.
After all, which race is better – one in which several drivers swap the lead or one in which a driver dominates to the point of boredom? I think you know.
NASCAR tells us that, through six races, there has been an average of 13 leaders per race, the most in series history.
Again I would say this is the result of circumstances. But I would also say that, as far as fan and media appeal, it beats the hell out of anything else.
We know that prior to Kevin Harvick’s win at Martinsville, his second in a row, there were five different winners in the first five races of the season. It’s the first time that’s happened since 2005.
Once more, it’s all about circumstances.
But then, given what has happened so far, consider this: You tell me, if you like real competition, what is more appealing – that one or two drivers dominate or that several win – and in some cases we are ultimately greatly surprised when they do?
Case in point: Face it, when Trevor Bayne and Wood Brothers Racing won the Daytona 500 was that not a big, pleasant surprise that ultimately captured national attention?
Headed into Texas, seven different teams occupied the top seven positions in the point standings. They were Joe Gibbs Racing, Roush Fenway Racing, Hendrick Motorsports, Penske Racing, Richard Childress Racing, Stewart Haas Racing and Chip Ganassi Racing.
Hey, I like it. To me it’s a more intriguing scenario than oh, say, for Roush to have four teams among the top seven and Hendrick the other three – unless you’re a big fan of either team, or both.
Finally, NASCAR pointed out that the top four drivers in the point standings all run different manufacturers.
If I had to guess, the sanctioning body revels in this statistic more than any other. It’s proof, somewhat, that its ongoing efforts to create a level playing field for all its participating manufacturers are paying off – for now, anyway.
I know all of this is NASCAR tooting its own horn. But why not? There have been seasons in the past when it didn’t have a horn to toot.
Tooting aside, the numbers do tell us the competition in NASCAR, so far, ain’t been bad at all.
Starting at Texas tonight, we’ll see if stays the same, gets better or gets worse.